MesaGod666
Well-known member
This thread shall serve as the official MARK V SETTINGS thread until Ned (or whoever) puts up a tone settings page on the Grailtone site.
Not when I get done with it......MesaGod666 said:Passive pups sound better in the V than active EMG's. That's for sure.
PeeMonkey said:Do you guys think running the ch. masters high and lowering the master output is better than balancing the two? The way I have it setup right now is about noon on most of the masters and about 10-11:00 on the output. Wondering if there is a diff if I dime the ch. masters, and lower my output to about 9:00
I know in some amps this makes a difference.
PeeMonkey said:Do you guys think running the ch. masters high and lowering the master output is better than balancing the two? The way I have it setup right now is about noon on most of the masters and about 10-11:00 on the output. Wondering if there is a diff if I dime the ch. masters, and lower my output to about 9:00
I know in some amps this makes a difference.
ned said:Now that I'm actually home for a couple of weeks I'll get a settings DB up. Probably next weekend as I have no gigs.
Noonoo said:"John Petrucci's Mark V Settings with a moderate mid scoop.
H/T: jdurso"
As far as I knew JP has not been using the Mark V yet, according to folks on JP's site. Perhaps I am wrong. Where are these pics from?
Enter your email address to join: