When I tried the 2010 Triple at a GC a while back, some guy had walked out there after playing and complaining about it. He was trying to a tight chugga metal thing. I went in there, he had the gain dimed, treble and presence almost maxed out, bass around 3 o'clock, mids down around 9 o'clock, etc. Using tube rectos and spongy, etc. Virtually the exact opposite of what I woudl have used, haha. So I tweaked it up for a few, started jamming, and the look on his face was priceless. One of those "That amp didn't sound like THAT when I was playing it a minute ago," haha. Went through all the modes and spent at least an hour in the loud room jamming on it, drew quite a crowd at one point. When I was done, there was guys waiting to try it out... :mrgreen:
I do agree that most of the bad rep Rectos have is from guys who have no idea how to dial it in to get what they want out of it. There's a TON of tones in there to be had if you know what you're doing with it. I have my '94 Dual Recto Rev G (w/factory serial loop), my '93 Triple Recto Rev F, and I'd like to add a 2010 Triple to the lineup. I don't think I need anything other than that. It's all Rectos, but they all sound a little different, and I've come to realize over the years that the Recto sound is just "my" sound.
I don't even "need" the 2010, but I'd like to add one of the current offerings to my backline just to have. I could use either my Rev G or Rev F, and with the use of a couple pedals in front and the volume knob on my guitar, I could easily play anything from modern rock, punk, pop rock, metal, and even country if I really felt the need. The amps are a lot more versatile than people give them credit for.