temps said:... a Mark V would be.. more modern sounding then a Mark IV and with a lot more gain on tap in channel 2 ...
Antoine said:temps said:... a Mark V would be.. more modern sounding then a Mark IV and with a lot more gain on tap in channel 2 ...
I totaly like the MarkIV for his "vintage" sound, and i like it a lot more than these hyper compressed too digitaly sounding moderns distortions we hear today, metal tones with too much low end for me. So if the MarkV will not be voiced a la Mark series, it would not be a Mark for me !
Antoine said:temps said:... a Mark V would be.. more modern sounding then a Mark IV and with a lot more gain on tap in channel 2 ...
I totaly like the MarkIV for his "vintage" sound, and i like it a lot more than these hyper compressed too digitaly sounding moderns distortions we hear today, metal tones with too much low end for me. So if the MarkV will not be voiced a la Mark series, it would not be a Mark for me !
JAZZGEAR said:Antoine said:temps said:I dig the Mark IV as is, the only appealing thing to me in a Mark V would be the complete independence of tone controls per channels...and perhaps a bit more gain avail in Rhythm 2; add a reverb button on the controller, tuner out -- and that's it. Although I don't know how they'd fit all of that on the controller -- perhaps only the wide body format (but I don't like that one for what I play).
mr_fender said:JAZZGEAR said:Antoine said:I totally agree. The best feature of the Mark amps is that they are NOT "modern" sounding amps. The recto buzzy & boomy sound has gotten really old IMHO. If I had my chance at designing the Mark V it would be something like:
Channel 1 - Mark series cleans (or maybe Lonestar cleans)
Channel 2 - Mark IIC+ gain
Channel 3 - Mark IV gain
Fully independent tone controls on each channel
Lonestar's reverb circuit w/ front panel mix control for each channel
Series FX Loop with on/off switches per channel
100 watts Simul-class with simul or class A switch per channel
Tube swapping options like Mark IV
Triode/Pentode switch per channel
All the push/pulls and voicing options of the Mark IV
Output mute and recording out like Mark IV
Solo control over all channels like rectos and stilettos
Graphic EQ with on/off switch for each channel
Channel 1,2,3, EQ, Reverb, FX Loop, and Solo on footswitch
Head or Closed back (or maybe convertible) 1x12 or 2x12 combo
That would be a BEAST. Oh well we can dream can't we.
Antoine said:I don't have a need for a MarkV, the IV is perfect as it is for me, including the RHY2 channel that so many owners seems to dislike, i like it a lot, as RHY1 and Lead !!!
Enter your email address to join: