Yeah, now they come out with the TC100. Not upset over that by any means and I do plan on getting one when they become available. As for the TC-50, I have been enjoying that amp nearly every day since I got it (except for about 3 weeks due to a minor problem while it was back at Mesa for repair). It did not get much traction when it came back as I had interests elsewhere (JP-2C and the Mark V). Now that I am back on the TC-50 again, life is good.
I have read that some complain that there is not enough bottom end. I do not have that issue as this amp is quite similar to the Royal Atlantic so you need to dial in more bass on Ch2 and Ch3 to compensate as well as reduce the treble a bit. I have yet to get the amp to sound muddy. So far the Vertical 212 or the OS Recto 412 are perfect cabs to use with the TC-50. The 412 offers up a bit more midrange and a hint less bottom end than the 212 cabinets. I have also tried it with the Horizontal cab too. My preference is the Vertical 212 with this amp.
How many will jump on the TC-100? Do you like the TC-50 or is there something you like better? I am just curious what others feel about their TC-50. I am loving mine so it is a keeper. 8)
I have read that some complain that there is not enough bottom end. I do not have that issue as this amp is quite similar to the Royal Atlantic so you need to dial in more bass on Ch2 and Ch3 to compensate as well as reduce the treble a bit. I have yet to get the amp to sound muddy. So far the Vertical 212 or the OS Recto 412 are perfect cabs to use with the TC-50. The 412 offers up a bit more midrange and a hint less bottom end than the 212 cabinets. I have also tried it with the Horizontal cab too. My preference is the Vertical 212 with this amp.
How many will jump on the TC-100? Do you like the TC-50 or is there something you like better? I am just curious what others feel about their TC-50. I am loving mine so it is a keeper. 8)