This may be a silly question though being newbbie with these 2 power amps I thought I might ask.
I've owned a 2:90 years ago and I was looking into something smaller and lighter, hence the 20/20. This unit is known for being very loud for 20/20 watts. In my eternal search for the perfect tone I just acquired a 50/50 as the 20/20 was coloring my sound in a way I didn't like, I was in the need for a tighter low end response. (Inevitably we gravitate to heavier amps)
Now that I'm comparing these 2 power amps and I get about the same loudness on the 50/50 with its volume at noon as with the 20/20 with its volume at 9 o'clock.
My question: Although I should be retubing the 50/50 as it has old tubes (but supposedly in good shape), is the difference in loudness between these 2 power amps that minimal because of the 20/20 ridiculously loud characteristic? Or is it really that the 50/50 tubes are in need of replacement? Or am I missing something here?
I've owned a 2:90 years ago and I was looking into something smaller and lighter, hence the 20/20. This unit is known for being very loud for 20/20 watts. In my eternal search for the perfect tone I just acquired a 50/50 as the 20/20 was coloring my sound in a way I didn't like, I was in the need for a tighter low end response. (Inevitably we gravitate to heavier amps)
Now that I'm comparing these 2 power amps and I get about the same loudness on the 50/50 with its volume at noon as with the 20/20 with its volume at 9 o'clock.
My question: Although I should be retubing the 50/50 as it has old tubes (but supposedly in good shape), is the difference in loudness between these 2 power amps that minimal because of the 20/20 ridiculously loud characteristic? Or is it really that the 50/50 tubes are in need of replacement? Or am I missing something here?