The Boogie Board

Discussion Forum for Mesa Boogie Products
It is currently Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:57 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:14 pm 
Offline
Donating Member

Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 9:07 am
Posts: 148
Got the SRG lll+ back from Mesa. The amp sounds and feels fantastic. It’s not as bass heavy as the DRG’s. I had Mike B. install the R2 knob on the underside of the chassis so I could keep the Direct Out.
With an MC-90 speaker it’s just light enough to be a grab and combo.

_________________
Mark llc+ (HR x 5, DR x 2, HRG x 2, DRG x 2, KDRG)
Mark lll (lll+DRG 105, lll+DRG X101, lll+SRG, HRG No Stripe)
Mark V 25
Dual Rec (1994 Rev G x 2)
Mini Rec
Studio Preamp + 50/50
D-180


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:31 pm 
Offline
Mark II

Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:37 pm
Posts: 71
xdg999 wrote:
Got the SRG lll+ back from Mesa. The amp sounds and feels fantastic. It’s not as bass heavy as the DRG’s. I had Mike B. install the R2 knob on the underside of the chassis so I could keep the Direct Out.
With an MC-90 speaker it’s just light enough to be a grab and combo.


How pronounced is the difference in low end? Is the tightness comparable?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:42 pm 
Offline
Donating Member

Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 9:07 am
Posts: 148
I really like the SRG with a Telecaster. Definitely spankier than the DRG’s which is why I decided to send it in for the lll+ mod. It’s similar to an HR c+ switched to 60 watts. It’s tighter than the DRG’s but the new caps need to get broken in so it should loosen up a little bit. I have it in a combo with Mesa Russian 12ax7’s, 440’s and an MS-12 speaker. I didn’t get to spend a lot of time with it since I also just picked up another c+ and a D-180. And I’m usually out of town for work. The D-180 came with 4 Tungsram’s and 6 of the 415’s. When I get home Saturday I’m going to try the Tungsram’s and 415’s in the SRG.

_________________
Mark llc+ (HR x 5, DR x 2, HRG x 2, DRG x 2, KDRG)
Mark lll (lll+DRG 105, lll+DRG X101, lll+SRG, HRG No Stripe)
Mark V 25
Dual Rec (1994 Rev G x 2)
Mini Rec
Studio Preamp + 50/50
D-180


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:01 pm 
Offline
Mark III

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2018 8:32 am
Posts: 153
Regarding the III to IIC+ mod, after buying a IIC+ to compare and double check my schematics, I've just finished off the III+ mod for lions on a Green Stripe. A few things I'd like to revisit after getting a IIC+ finally and comparing the two and tracing that properly as there are some mistakes in the IIC+ schematic I drew up before which I have now corrected (links to google drive are the same):

1. The 47K and 0.047uF on the V2A anode for the III can be swapped around (R113/C505). This is how it's done in the RP10A IIC+ boards. I think this changed for the RP11A board though. It shouldn't make much difference in sound though.

2. Adding in the extra voltage rail with an extra 30uF filter cap will work but there is a 4V drop in the IIC+ between D and D+. For all intense and purposes replacing R140 with a 5.6K resistor and making the power rail for the Preamp/Lead/Reverb 12AX7s as D will do exactly the same job. It's better that way and more stable than running a load of wires and putting in an extra cap. You're talking about 4V plate voltage difference by doing all that effort. NOT worth it IMO. The extra cap a hangover from the IIC where there was a significant voltage drop between each of the rails. Then they stuck a 1K resistor in instead of a 6.8K for the IIC+ and it does basically nothing. In the later IIC+s the voltage was increased even more by replacing the 5.6K resistors with 1K, meaning there was virtually no voltage drop which is the reason they ended up using 3x30uF caps in the III.

3. R205 should be put between R239 and R225/R122/C516 and where R205 was before make this go to ground with bus wire. This makes a BIG difference to the sound. Be careful in doing this as you'll need to lift components off the ground and form a triangle pyramid of components, similar to when you add the extra 100K and 10uF/63V in for the EQ section.

4. R238 resistor that goes to the presence pot is 1.5K on the IIC+. NOT 3.3K. I have never seen this as 3.3K in any pictures I can see of a IIC+.

5. Do not try to wire the III+ pots or grounding exactly like the IIC+. Leave everything as is. If you try to change it you'll get weird grounding and hum issues. I have this now on my III+ which I went overboard on and now need to change back. It'll all look a lot neater too. It's wired that way for a reason because of the PCB style. If you want exact wiring of a IIC+ you need to build a clone board of everything and basically build a DIY IIC+ clone in a III chassis. That's way overboard for a 'mod'.

6. The extra treble shift LDR in the Red Stripes onwards and the extra diode/resistor can be removed without any impact (well perhaps - see No. 7)

7. I can't seem to engage R2 when the Lead is engaged on the Green Stripe. I can on the Black Stripe. I'll look into why this is done (guessing Mesa changed the LDR layout slightly to prevent this) but without changing will prevent the ++ being switchable on the Lead channel which kind of defeats the point. I will check the LDR rails and fix this though. Is this how the Blues and Greens are supposed to behave regarding R2? I can't tell since I've already done the mod... :(

Side by side the III+ Green Stripe and IIC+ sound very similar. Each has a slightly different characteristic. However, they sound and feel the same and I can play each for hours. There are also some component difference values which would count towards this but no more than how two C+s will sound different side to side. The EQ sliders have a wider range on my IIC+ (measured with a multimeter) so if you set the controls the same they sound different, but you can make them sound the same by trial and error. Same with the pots due to manufacturing at the time.

I'd still pick my IIC+ over the III but just because of the more high quality hand built feel and separate PCB boards/twisted wires everywhere rather than the all in one PCB. Overall there is less hum in the IIC+ because of this and it's quieter overall.

I'll give you an update once resolved the R2 LDR for lead mode issue.

Cheers,

Jon


Last edited by jrb32 on Wed Jan 02, 2019 4:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 9:07 pm 
Offline
Mark II

Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 1:36 am
Posts: 128
jrb32 wrote:
Is this how the Blues and Greens are supposed to behave regarding R2? I can't tell since I've already done the mod... :(


I can engage R2 when I'm on the Lead channel with my Blue Stripe. AFAIK, you can engage R2 and Lead at the same time on all Mark IIIs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2019 5:03 am 
Offline
Mark III

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2018 8:32 am
Posts: 153
Quote:
I can engage R2 when I'm on the Lead channel with my Blue Stripe. AFAIK, you can engage R2 and Lead at the same time on all Mark IIIs.


That's what I thought! Supposedly the R2 volume boost is minor on the lead channel on the green stripes from what I've heard. Either way in the end I bypassed the R2 switching completely and wired the ++ mod (the 15uF cap on the cathode with a 100K between the treble/volume pot) as a simple ON/OFF switch for when the Rhythm pot is pulled. Works really great and is foot switchable too! Can be engaged on both Lead and Rhythm mode.

Just finishing off. I've noticed some voltage differences in some of the 715P power caps (they're 200V in the IIC+ and 400V in the III) so changing these just to see what difference it will make (none in theory right but you never know...)

Thanks,

Jon


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 6:45 pm 
Offline
Donating Member

Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 9:07 am
Posts: 148
I picked up a mint Mark lll HRG no stripe combo yesterday. The amp came with the original tubes. A quad of STR-415’s, a Mesa labeled Chinese Military in v1 and Tungsrams in v2-v5. The amps sounds really good stock but I like my 60 watt lll+ better. The cleans are better and the lead channel is more touch responsive on the 60 watt. Look’s like the HRG is gonna make a trip to Mesa so Mike B. can work his magic.

_________________
Mark llc+ (HR x 5, DR x 2, HRG x 2, DRG x 2, KDRG)
Mark lll (lll+DRG 105, lll+DRG X101, lll+SRG, HRG No Stripe)
Mark V 25
Dual Rec (1994 Rev G x 2)
Mini Rec
Studio Preamp + 50/50
D-180


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:11 am 
Offline
Mark III

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2018 8:32 am
Posts: 153
Quote:
I picked up a mint Mark lll HRG no stripe combo yesterday. The amp came with the original tubes. A quad of STR-415’s, a Mesa labeled Chinese Military in v1 and Tungsrams in v2-v5. The amps sounds really good stock but I like my 60 watt lll+ better. The cleans are better and the lead channel is more touch responsive on the 60 watt. Look’s like the HRG is gonna make a trip to Mesa so Mike B. can work his magic.


Living the dream! I've spotted a really cheap IIB near me that I'm really tempted by... going for the whole set one day probably :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 4:14 pm 
Offline
Donating Member

Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 9:07 am
Posts: 148
I have a hard time resisting buying an amp if the price is right. The Mark lll HRG I just bought was $950 with a road case, EV speaker and the 105 transformer. I had to drive almost 500 miles round trip to pick it up. Never thought I would have this much stuff. All I wanted was another c+ HR combo.

_________________
Mark llc+ (HR x 5, DR x 2, HRG x 2, DRG x 2, KDRG)
Mark lll (lll+DRG 105, lll+DRG X101, lll+SRG, HRG No Stripe)
Mark V 25
Dual Rec (1994 Rev G x 2)
Mini Rec
Studio Preamp + 50/50
D-180


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 4:53 am 
Offline
Mark III

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2018 8:32 am
Posts: 153
Same here! Similar amount of driving to get my IIC+ and III but the price was right so I couldn't say no...

Back to the III+ mod! On the green I swapped over the 715P power caps with 200V versions as in the IIC+ and made the B voltage rail so it goes to the reverb 12ax7 (lifted R116 and ran a wire off the B rail filter cap neatly around the PCB board where the other wires go, again same as in the IIC+). It really does sound identical to my IIC+ and made a huge difference. Really quiet and reverb works great as it should! Take off the weird 2W 120K reverb fix resistor going to ground coming off R116. Instead add the new B voltage rail along with, ideally, a 2W 10K resistor in place of R116.

Weird how much the reverb circuit can affect the rest of the amp but it definitely does!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group