Playing harmonics through Rectifiers vs. other amps

The Boogie Board

Help Support The Boogie Board:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Given To Fly

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
225
Reaction score
0
I feel like I have a lot of "elephants in the room" when it comes to the electric guitar. I'm always relieved when someone else observes the same "elephant" and mentions it.

My main guitar/amp setup is an EBMM JPX-7 (stock) through a Roadster 2x12 Combo. Guitar - cable - amp. Very simple, very straightforward. Over the years, I've noticed harmonics of all types, but especially pinch harmonics, are never easy to get through my Roadster. Also, they never "scream" for lack of a better term. I assumed "practice" was the best solution but another person made the same unprompted observation about Rectifiers in general. To put the matter in stark contrast, I played through the TC-50 combo for a good while the other day and pinch harmonics were effortless (and if I am to be totally honest, guitar playing was effortless!) I do not know how high up the harmonic series I was able to play but it was high and it was fun! The guitar I was playing was an EBMM Majesty which has a built-in preamp that provides a +20 db gain boost. Unplugged, this was an easy guitar to play but I also played an Ibanez JS2450 through the TC-50 and the experience was more or less the same.

So, my first question is do any of you find Rectifiers to be less harmonic friendly than other amps? If so, do you have any insight on why that might be? If not, do you have any insight on why that might be? Do EL-34's play a part in all of this?
 
I use a clean boost with my rectifiers. One side effect is a noticeable improvement in pinch harmonics.

This seems less necessary with the Mark series. I haven't really noticed one way or another with my TC-50 yet.
 
That's the way it is. It's partly due to Rectifier series' dark tone and partly because they are not that compressed. When you increase the gain, you also increase the amount of low-mids which can easily dominate the upper mid frequencies. This equals "more grunt, less scream". That's why boosting them benefits so many. You can increase the signal from the front to set the gain control where the lows are less drastic.

I think EL34 can help with the overall tone, but the most important changes with these amps come from preamp section.
 
Shemham said:
That's the way it is. It's partly due to Rectifier series' dark tone and partly because they are not that compressed. When you increase the gain, you also increase the amount of low-mids which can easily dominate the upper mid frequencies. This equals "more grunt, less scream". That's why boosting them benefits so many. You can increase the signal from the front to set the gain control where the lows are less drastic.

I think EL34 can help with the overall tone, but the most important changes with these amps come from preamp section.
+1

The Rectos are very low-mid oriented, and turning up the gain will make it worse.

A good boost out front with the amp's gain at 12:30-1:00, and the presence & treble controls are the secret to these amps IMHO. I really like the TS-9 or OD-808 types, with the gain very low and the level very high. Right now I'm using a Mesa Grid Slammer with great results, and my fav, a TS-9 modded to be more like an OD-808. I use a compressor in addition to the boost for lead tones. I really like the Xotic SP for cleans and leads, and the Pigtronix Philosopher's tone is nice for leads also.

Dom
 
Thank you for your replies.

dipasco, I agree that the Mark series is harmonic friendly. If you boost your Rectifiers and play a Mark Series amp then the TC-50 may not have the same impact on you as it did on me.

Shemham, I appreciate your reply. It is informative, has a nice quip "more grunt, less scream," and confirms what I felt was true. I could get a boost pedal but for reasons that may not be logical, I would rather not go that route. When I was playing the EBMM Majesty and had the +20 gain boost engaged, I saw no reason to ever turn it off (I chose not to use the clean channel that day). Similarly, I know I would become dependent on a boost pedal and never turn it off. Same with wah pedals and octave pedals. I lack restraint, which is why I use a "guitar - cable - amp" setup as much as possible. However, when it is time to bring in the FX I get the Eventides out and various front end pedals. I see where a boost could help me, but I also see where it could hinder me if I didn't happen to have it with me. It also doesn't help that I am playing a rather dark sounding guitar into a dark amp with the EQ dialed in with a sparse amount of high end. I can work on that. 8)
 
Yep, you got that right. EQ'ing Rectos can be challenging as it's not really that intuitive. Your guitar as well as the pickups play major part in that too so there're no exact settings one could really give for particular sound. With some guitars and pickups Rectifiers can actually sound like they were using boost due to their inherent tone. To simplify, it's all about upper mids. I remember once using Dimarzio Crunch Lab with RG-series Ibanez. That one didn't really need boost pedal thanks to its high output and mid spike.

Some setting generalizations could be made. If you want to set it, for instance, more Soldanoish/Marshallesque, you gotta turn the bass practically all the way down and raise the presence and mids somewhat from normal levels. This can help with the pinch harmonics and provide more musical feedback. At first, it might sound smaller and somewhat boxy, but after a while your ears will adjust. In the band context you shouldn't notice any major difference in the tone, but playing would feel easier.
 
I get that you don't want to become "dependent" on the boost pedal. However, if that were built into the amp, would you consider it to the be the same thing? If the amp were voiced exactly as if it had the boost, would you feel the same?

Ultimately, it has become standard practice to boost high-gain amps, especially rectifiers, to get them to scream. Almost every heavy rock player I'm aware of does it, and they leave the pedal on all the time, unless they are playing clean. So I look at rectos and a boost pedal as two parts of the same thing, not a codependent relationship. I also see it with Bogners, Framus, etc.
 
elvis said:
I get that you don't want to become "dependent" on the boost pedal. However, if that were built into the amp, would you consider it to the be the same thing? If the amp were voiced exactly as if it had the boost, would you feel the same?

Ultimately, it has become standard practice to boost high-gain amps, especially rectifiers, to get them to scream. Almost every heavy rock player I'm aware of does it, and they leave the pedal on all the time, unless they are playing clean. So I look at rectos and a boost pedal as two parts of the same thing, not a codependent relationship. I also see it with Bogners, Framus, etc.

First, remember I said my reasoning was not necessarily logical. But to answer your questions, if the boost were built into the amp and could be turned on and off I would be able to hear the difference tones, prefer one over the other, and more than likely only use that particular tone. That would bother me. If the amp was voiced a particular way with nothing to compare the tone against, I would consider it a good amp and that would not bother me.

I am not looking for a solution, I just wanted to know if anyone else had observed the same thing. Good questions though; they made me think. :idea:
 
Shemham said:
Yep, you got that right. EQ'ing Rectos can be challenging as it's not really that intuitive. Your guitar as well as the pickups play major part in that too so there're no exact settings one could really give for particular sound. With some guitars and pickups Rectifiers can actually sound like they were using boost due to their inherent tone. To simplify, it's all about upper mids. I remember once using Dimarzio Crunch Lab with RG-series Ibanez. That one didn't really need boost pedal thanks to its high output and mid spike.

Some setting generalizations could be made. If you want to set it, for instance, more Soldanoish/Marshallesque, you gotta turn the bass practically all the way down and raise the presence and mids somewhat from normal levels. This can help with the pinch harmonics and provide more musical feedback. At first, it might sound smaller and somewhat boxy, but after a while your ears will adjust. In the band context you shouldn't notice any major difference in the tone, but playing would feel easier.

My guitar has a CrunchLab 7 in the bridge position. :lol: This from the Dimarzio site: "The Crunch Lab 7™ is noteworthy (bad pun alert) for what it doesn’t do — it’s not a screamer, and it’s not about thundering lows." I think a pickup that is "not a screamer" being played through one of the darker Rectifiers is enough to confirm my suspicion. That is not to say there are not adjustments I can still make.
 
Hah, funny coincidence with the pickup! Yeah, I recall it wasn't that bright, but it was tight and had pretty high output.

Frankly, I wasn't too happy with the stock sound either as the lead sound was never singing in the way I liked. I ended up modding Recto's preamp closer to SLO/earliest Rectos which helped a ton. There're few resistors which add some lowend beef and grunt, but take away highs and mids at the same time. These resistors can be jumpered easily by anyone with a solder station and some minor experience - and it's easily revertable. Of course, at this point it's fair to question why to buy a rather expensive amp and end up modifying it?
 
Modern mode CH 4 has a mid boost in the EQ and the Presence allows control over the final treble filter in the preamp. The Presence will allow the harmonics for nearly the entire fretboard to be heard when set between 9:00 and Noon, with mid control not scooped, or the bass turned up too much.
 
afu said:
Modern mode CH 4 has a mid boost in the EQ and the Presence allows control over the final treble filter in the preamp. The Presence will allow the harmonics for nearly the entire fretboard to be heard when set between 9:00 and Noon, with mid control not scooped, or the bass turned up too much.

Thank you afu! I agree that these settings work, or at least, they are revealing.
 
Nah, pinch harmonics are no problem on these amps. The register is just a little lower. It is in the attitude of the playing which results in pulling off good sounding pinch harmonics. Playing it to just get that noise usually results in a poor squeal. Play the squeal like you are trying to rip off some skin and it'll sound way better. It is OK to make the Guitar God face at this point.
 
I never really noticed this with the Roadster before. Now that I revisited this not so long ago after reading this post, I would agree with you. Seems a bit more difficult to get a good ring out on the pinch harmonics especially further up on the fret board. A compressor on the front end or even the grid slammer will help to some degree.
 
Well, one thing that was revealing was I needed a new volume potentiometer. Sometimes, when I would roll the volume back up to 100% it would not quite make it. This happened with afu's settings and natural harmonics on the 5th fret were not coming out. I touched the volume knob and that was all the guitar needed for the harmonics to return and the volume pot. to actually reach 100%. The guitar is having the volume pot installed right now.

As people have said, compression, gain, and the 2000Hz - 3000Hz mid-range area seem to be your allies when you want "Bad Horsie" type harmonics. I can get those things if needed, but honest and informed opinions from other guitarists are much harder to get, which is why I posted this thread here. 8)
 
Once in a while you need to have something to help the amp accentuate your technique. Pinch off harmonics was my thing back in the 90's. I gave it up a while ago but all of my Mark amps I had in the past were always eager to squeal to your desire. RA is also an easy pick too but with high gain settings used, it can get sloppy with feedback if you are too close to the speakers. The rectifier amps are a series I have never really understood. Love the Roadster for what it is. Pinch off harmonics are much easier on CH3 than in CH4 as the presence control seems to have more influence in CH3 and the other being much darker in its character. Somehow I believe there is more cancelling of the harmonics with the Roadster than with the other amps due to its darker tone.

Try using a stainless steel pick. That was a trick I used back in the day that worked every time.
 
bandit2013 said:
Somehow I believe there is more canceling of the harmonics with the Roadster than with the other amps due to its darker tone.

I'm glad you said that. The JPX-7 is not a solid body guitar. It has a chambered body. Chambered body guitars affect the harmonics of the vibrating string. That is where the internet led me in 14 different directions so I stopped reading. If the Roadster naturally cancels harmonics, and my guitar does something to the harmonic content of the strings, then that is pretty interesting to me and probably no one else.

I have never tried a stainless steel pick. I will look into it! :D
 
One complaint my band mates have made, all you do is pinch off harmonics... For some weird reason that is what I did most of the time ever since I learned how to do it. Now I rarely do it any more. Note: the stainless pick will alter the sound of the attack and you end up wearing out the strings quicker as the metal pick is not as forgiving as a plastic one. Even so, I generally use very heavy picks if they are plastic as I found thin picks do not do it for me. Also, the rounder part of the pick helps to get more skin on the string. I have tried aluminum, copper picks along with many other things not generally used with a guitar for different effects (steel ball bearing can be interesting with a delay). I stumbled upon some stainless still picks back in 1990 which became my favorite. I still have them and they are still in the same shape as when I first got them.

In general (but I could be wrong about this) Rectifier amps like the Roadster have the general EQ latter in the gain stages that a Mark series amp (which is practically the 2nd stage (except for ch2 of the Mark V). Having the tone controls farther down the chain allows for at least 3 gain stages on the raw guitar signal before it gets filtered. What does help is a transparent style compressor on the front end that allows the softer tone of the smaller strings to be emphasized and balances out the signal level across the spectrum. I have tried a few but they tend to add noise. Optical compressors tend to be more quiet with lower levels of white noise. Probably why I love the Strymon OB.1 compressor, I can barely tell if it is on or off when I am not playing the guitar. I have not tried a Keely, I would have if the OB.1 did not work out for me. I had a boss compressor a long time ago but gave that to a friend at the time I had given up playing. That one was OK.
 
bandit2013 said:
Once in a while you need to have something to help the amp accentuate your technique. Pinch off harmonics was my thing back in the 90's. I gave it up a while ago but all of my Mark amps I had in the past were always eager to squeal to your desire.

I experienced the same thing with the Mark Series. Why is that? I realize that is a simple question with a complex answer but a direct comparison might be helpful.
 
Back
Top