The Boogie Board

Discussion Forum for Mesa Boogie Products
It is currently Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:28 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 11:15 am 
Offline
Mark III
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:07 pm
Posts: 329
Location: Marysville, California, USA
JUS wrote:
... "Ring out" your cables with a mulitmeter ... interference is another question ...


Drat, there goes my secrets LOL :lol:

+1

Dennis

_________________
Mark III no mark w Randy's initials & some IIc+ parts
50 Caliber (6BQ5) 4xEL84
Heartbreaker
Fender 75
Acoustic 165

1970 LPGT
1981 The Strat
1983 GZ-300
1983 (Elite Neck)/2001 FrankenStrat
1990 Firebird
more guitars, so little characters


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:45 pm 
Offline
Mark III

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:48 pm
Posts: 157
Of course they make difference in sound. Just A/B some random Proel or other "basic" brand cables with any higher-end cables (Reference, PW, Monster, George L's) and you'll spot a huge difference on the noise a cable can add and the clarity, upper/lower frequencies it can cut off. Of course it also depends on the rest of you rig (any very bad element in your chain can ruin the whole sound despite of how good intrument/patch/speaker cable you use). I wasn't so aware about cables years ago 'till I started using more expensive rigs and a guitarist I was sessioning with asked wich cables I used and when I said "I don't know, I just buy random cables of the lenght I need" so he looked at me with a "you drink champagne in plastic cups?" expression :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:27 pm 
Offline
Mark IV
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:02 pm
Posts: 516
JUS wrote:
Here is a test. "Ring out" your cables with a mulitmeter. You will find for similar length cable, the resistance is similar across brands. This is the only factor that will "inhibit" sound, the resistance of the conductor.

Now, interference is another question. So long as the insulation is good (last time I checked, cross linked poly ethylene is....cross linked poly ethylene), and there is sufficient shielding attached to an appropriate gound, the amount of interference should be similar.

Bottom line, avoid the cheapest, Made in Kazhakstan cables on the market, but do not buy into the hype of adverstising.

-JUS-


ps. Planet Waves cables work great.


+1

_________________
When Gibsons are outlawed, only outlaws will have Gibsons


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:22 am 
Offline
Mark I

Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:06 pm
Posts: 46
Location: Bogota D.C., Colombia
benjamin801 wrote:
Deathf***ingmetal wrote:
Also AC-power cables do improve your tone, if you're using tube amps. Here's the trick:

http://www.mercurymagnetics.com/pages/mainframe.htm

These are the best $10 you could spend to improve your tone, I'm serious.


Eh. Crack open your amp. Look at the wire running from the IEC jack to the power switch. Understand that any current that's flowing through your AC cable is also flowing through that, and ask yourself why a thicker AC cable, or one of a different composition, would make any difference. Hell, if you have a newer, mass-produced amp, power may even be flowing through PCB traces.

Well... to be honest... I don't mean to be rude but I don't give a rat's a$$ about theorical stuff. I just go with what I hear, and if there's an audible improvement, then it's all good. I've done several A/B tests with the the standard AWG 18 cables and the thicker AWG 14 cable and it always makes the amp sound better, so there must be a good technical reason for that.

_________________
"Louder is not necessarily better... it's jut louder... and better!!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:42 pm 
Offline
Mark III

Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:40 pm
Posts: 181
Location: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Deathf***ingmetal wrote:
Well... to be honest... I don't mean to be rude but I don't give a rat's a$$ about theorical stuff. I just go with what I hear, and if there's an audible improvement, then it's all good. I've done several A/B tests with the the standard AWG 18 cables and the thicker AWG 14 cable and it always makes the amp sound better, so there must be a good technical reason for that.


In that case, more power to you! If it sounds better to you, that's what matters. :mrgreen:

_________________
- 1999 Gibson LPC, lefty, SD JB/Jazz.
- Mesa/Boogie Mark III (blue stripe) --> Mesa Recto Standard 4x12
- TC Electronic Nova System


BAND


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:40 pm 
Offline
Mark IV
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:47 pm
Posts: 815
Location: Australia
There is more to a cable than just its resistance, though speaker cables are more about resistance. I thought someone else would have mentioned it already, but the capacitance of the cable can have a large effect. A lot of cheap cables tend to have a high capacitance and this can roll the top end off quite a lot. Some people like that effect (Jimi hendrix) others don't.

Using shorter cable runs and a good buffer can do wonders.

Personally I am a little fussy with cables and so far the best cable I have used is the Dimarzio one, which also happens to be very low capacitiance.

_________________
Triple Crown 50 combo
Electra Dyne and Royal Atlantic heads
Express 5:25 1x12 combo
JCM800 2203
Deluxe reverb reissue
Traditional 2x12, 4x10 and 23" 1x12 cabs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:56 pm 
Offline
Mark II

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:37 pm
Posts: 65
benjamin801 wrote:
Deathf***ingmetal wrote:
Well... to be honest... I don't mean to be rude but I don't give a rat's a$$ about theorical stuff. I just go with what I hear, and if there's an audible improvement, then it's all good. I've done several A/B tests with the the standard AWG 18 cables and the thicker AWG 14 cable and it always makes the amp sound better, so there must be a good technical reason for that.


In that case, more power to you! If it sounds better to you, that's what matters. :mrgreen:


All cables, by design, are capacitors. Could you please explain what makes one cable more capacitive than another?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:15 pm 
Offline
Mark IV
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:47 pm
Posts: 815
Location: Australia
Sure, its easily explained.

Capacitance is formed between the two conductors in a regular cable. The surface area, kind of insulation used (between the conductors)and thickness are the big variables that effect the capacitance value.

With all things being equal a cable that uses thicker insulation will have lower capacitance.

I just went and measured 3 cables I own, two 20 foot leads (one I consider very good and the other average) and a 10 foot lead that I don't like.

The good cable came to about 600pF, the average cable 800pF and the 10 foot 700pF. A good number of cheap multimeters can measure capacitance so almost anyone can check themselves.

I should also mention where the cable capacitiance comes into play. A passive guitar pickup will generally have a fairly high output impedance and when combined with the cable capactiance will form a low pass RC filter. So if you have a setup with 2 20 foot cables (say 1000pF each), a true bypass pedal in the middle and guitar with an 8k Ohm passive pickup the top will have rolled back 3dB around 10Khz, but will have started the roll off around 5Khz. A buffered pedal or active pickups in that situation diminish the roll off to almost nothing at the frequencies we expect to hear from guitar amps.

_________________
Triple Crown 50 combo
Electra Dyne and Royal Atlantic heads
Express 5:25 1x12 combo
JCM800 2203
Deluxe reverb reissue
Traditional 2x12, 4x10 and 23" 1x12 cabs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:56 pm 
Offline
Mark II

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 3:08 pm
Posts: 116
I dont think monster cables are any better than horizon or pro co or my planet waves. But I do believe in buying quality cables. There just seems to be a point where spending more than 30 bucks on a 20 foot cable doesnt get you anything more than your normal cable. But Ill tell you those thin cheap pedal cables with the non servicable ends are horrible. They shouldnt even make those things. They are simply create noise.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:38 pm 
Offline
Mark III

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:54 pm
Posts: 168
Location: Wildomar, California
It does!! Honestly, the cables with the silver wiring and the gold jack makes a BIG difference. It's like plugging straight into the amp, without a cable. It's tonal modulation is just about as close as transparent as you can get!

_________________
]v[ E G A D E T ]-[

ಠ_ರೃ

///M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:20 am 
Offline
Single Recto

Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:16 am
Posts: 1258
Silver is a better conductor than copper in the ideal world. However, to purify silver is a more difficult task than copper, and much more expensive too. Also, the silver wiring would be more susceptible to oxidisation, whereas copper would be less so...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:10 pm 
Offline
Donating Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:30 pm
Posts: 2533
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA
The conductivity of silver is higher than copper. BUT not by much. To use a guitar application, a 20-foot piece of 24-gauge copper wire is about 0.52 Ohms. For silver, the same wire would be 0.48 Ohms.

Driving that cable into a 1Meg Ohm guitar amp input will give a drop in signal of 0.000052% for Copper and 0.000048% for Silver. No way you'll hear that.

Driving into a really junky FX pedal with 20k input impedance, the drop will be 0.0026% for Copper and 0.0024% for Silver. No way you'll hear that.

For reference, 1dB is 10%.

Combined with 20pF capacitance to ground, 0.52 Ohms causes significant frequency change at 15.3GHz (15 BILLION Hertz). Combined with a 1uF coupling capacitor, the filter effect (assuming zero input impedance, which is impossible) is around 300kHz. For a real system it is in the GHz range again.

Copper and Silver both oxidize. This can cause MANY Ohms of resistance at the plug, and can also cause intermittent contact. Gold does not oxidize nearly as much, and can make a more reliable contact. Outside of plug/jack pairs, it is not so good because it is higher resistance than copper.

It is questionable whether or not gold is useful if the plug is gold-coated, but the jack is not. This is almost always the case when using gold cables. The jack still oxidizes.

_________________
Electra Dyne Head
JP-2C WICKER, Baby!
Mini Rectifier blue LED
Recto 2x12 Horizontal
2x Recto 2x12 Vertical


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:45 pm 
Offline
Bottle Rocket

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:07 pm
Posts: 19
I read through this whole thread and was surprised to see that no one mentioned Whirlwind cables. This may sound strange, but I haven't bought a guitar cable in probably 10 years (maybe more). All of my cables are either Whirlwind or custom made cables from a local guitar shop. None of these cables broke the bank, but they weren't "budget" cables either. I've had enough cheap, noisy and prone to short out cables in my time. I had one Monster guitar cable and it developed a short in no time at all. I'm sure this isn't typical of Monster cables, but it put a bad taste in my mouth after forking over some significant dough for what was supposed to be a good cable. No more Monster and no more cheap cables for me. The way the quality of things changes these days I don't even know if Whirlwind still makes a good cable, but I know all the wws I bought between 10 and 20 years ago are still going strong, and they get used heavily.

_________________
60/100 Mark II C+ HX Head
100w Dual Rectifier Solo Head Rev G
Maverick 2x12


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:24 pm 
Offline
Single Recto
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 4:18 pm
Posts: 1970
Location: SL.UT
still using my .225 diameter George L's cables, and quite happy.
since 1980, haven't found another cable i liked better.
yea, there are better cables, if you've got money to waste.

_________________
'81 Mark 2B head ~ 60watt-GEQ


BatsBrew
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/batsbrew
https://soundcloud.com/bats-brew


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:24 pm 
Offline
Mark II

Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:34 pm
Posts: 65
I've been through a bunch and I notice................nothing different in sound. I see the better
cables last longer is all.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group