Search found 5 matches

by lpd
Sun May 19, 2019 5:42 pm
Forum: Vintage Amps (Before 1991)
Topic: Fake???
Replies: 13
Views: 1713

Re: Fake???

As I posted previously, it is indeed an early Boogie Looks like a handful of resistors and a cap were replaced, different power cord and speaker I assume. Also looks like the back panel may be replaced?? Sticker indicates September 73 any idea why the later date? It has three pull knobs; the first ...
by lpd
Sun May 19, 2019 5:32 pm
Forum: Vintage Amps (Before 1991)
Topic: Fake???
Replies: 13
Views: 1713

Re: Fake???

That is awesome news. Thanks for verifying that. I have a late 73 head that seems to be a prototype. Property tag era. All the ones with the gloss faceplate that I had seen previously were the Japanese clones. By 73 there wasn't much going on as far as prototypes. Enjoy! It’s legit. Sticker has Ran...
by lpd
Wed May 08, 2019 11:54 pm
Forum: Vintage Amps (Before 1991)
Topic: Fake???
Replies: 13
Views: 1713

Re: Fake???

Will know ASAP as I’m going to open her up and look at the boards. Apparently it was signed by Randall but I won’t believe the hype until I see the boards for myself :)
by lpd
Wed May 08, 2019 1:39 am
Forum: Vintage Amps (Before 1991)
Topic: Fake???
Replies: 13
Views: 1713

Re: Fake???

Hmm.. faceplate looks just "too" shiny.. Back looks rather bare of any info at all.. Wot are the tranny codes ? The O/T looks very Fenderish too Guts shots will tell in a millisecond.. Backplate timber looks non-orig as do the supports. And missing a couple of mounting screws on the backplate timbe...
by lpd
Sun May 05, 2019 4:24 pm
Forum: Vintage Amps (Before 1991)
Topic: Fake???
Replies: 13
Views: 1713

Fake???

Hi

This is locally listed as a Mark I but few things seem off. Volume/master order seems off as does the EQ tonestack order. No dynamo labels and stencilled faceplate.

Thoughts?

Image

Image